Sourdough starter Hydration Ratios: Thin vs Thick: How they smell, and how do they affect the final loaf.

Profile picture for user JonnyP

How "sour" does your starter smell?

When I use my soudough starter (typically about 6 hours after the final refresh), I remix it well, blow off the CO2, and take a whiff: it usually smells like vinegar (acetic acid; burns the nose).

In contradistinction, my home-made fermented pickles and Polish sour rye soup starter (500% hydration ratio), typically smell like lactic acid (sweet to the nose).

((Seeking to improve the lactic acid to acetic acid ratio in my sourdough bread, I have recently innoculated one of my sourdough cultures with a tablespoon of my Polish sour rye soup starter culture.  I then refreshed this sourdough bread culture at a "pancake batter" hydration ratio (?150%) every 12 hours for 2 days.))

Indeed, my new sourdough culture, now maintained at this high hydration ratio, smells much sweeter.  However, this does not mean that just 1/4 cup of this sweet-smelling starter will ferment 300g water and 400g flour, over 12 hours, to that same lactic-acid predominance in the final loaf.

I am seeking experienced wisdom regarding thin vs thick home-maintained sourdough starters, how they smell, and the basic differences on how they should be used in the practice to make high lactic-acid to acetic acid ratio bread at home.  If someone has already written a FAQ, article, or thread on this, please post that link.

JonnyP

Hi JonnyP,

I don't know how much detail you want, but I maintain a 100% starter (equal flour and water by weight), which I refresh 2 or 3 times a week and keep in the refrigerator between feedings.  I also maintain a 166%  hydration starter (equal flour and water by volume), which I keep on the countertop and refresh daily.  This is a very young starter, which I've only had for a couple of weeks.  I find a couple of differences between the two:

1) The 100% starter shows visible signs of activity, and it doubles in under 4 hours at room temperature. The 166% starter doesn't really increase in volume very much. Both raise dough very well. 

2) The 100% starter develops large bubbles on the surface and throughout the mixture. The 166% starter shows only tiny, tiny surface bubbles. 

3) The smell of the 100% starter is sweet and mild, but when I bake with it I get a somewhat tangy (sour) result. The 166% starter smells strikingly acidic, but I tend to get a very mild tasting loaf.

4) When I bake with the 100% starter, I tend to use only a small amount, like one or 2 tablespoons for a two-loaf.  With the 166% starter, I'm using a lot more, like 2 cups for a two-loaf batch.

Just my observations.

 

3) The smell of the 100% starter is sweet and mild, but when I bake with it I get a somewhat tangy (sour) result. The 166% starter smells strikingly acidic, but I tend to get a very mild tasting loaf.

4) When I bake with the 100% starter, I tend to use only a small amount, like one or 2 tablespoons for a two-loaf.  With the 166% starter, I'm using a lot more, like 2 cups for a two-loaf batch.

I've read that watery starters tend to favor the bacteria over the yeast, so all other things being equal, the thin starter should result in a tangier loaf. I'd guess, though, that the small amount of 100% starter you use is the reason for the sourness. That small amount probably leads to a relatively long fermentation time, which results in increased sourness. If you increased the amount of 100% starter you used, you'll get a milder tasting loaf.

That makes sense to me.  Thanks for the explanation.  

Perhaps she is co-authoring a chapter in some book?

Nah. But I have been busy working on articles and bread projects in between traveling. I don't get as much time here as I'd like, but I have posted at least a few times in 2011  :-)

Best wishes,
dw

DW,

Here are photos of my 9-month old daughter, Sophia, thanking you in return:

"Thanks DW!"

JonnyP